There’s no point in wishing luck to Theresa May’s successor

And, just like that, she’s gone. Theresa May, the least successful British prime minister in living memory, has resigned. So much agonizing, so much plotting, so many secret plans to get rid of her over so many months have failed. But following a European parliamentary election that saw her Conservative Party crash to historic lows, she has finally thrown in the towel. Bizarrely, she wants to hang around so that she can host President Trump in early June — her reasoning here, as in so many other areas, is unfathomable — and then she will go.

The race to replace her is already on. Boris Johnson’s leadership campaign has been hiring staff for many weeks. Dominic Raab, another candidate — there are at least a dozen — has had himself photographed, with his wife, in his lovely pastel kitchen. Several of her cabinet ministers have already started to hit the television studios. Though it’s an odd campaign: The only people who get to vote in this election are the paid-up members of the Tory party, some 124,000 people. According to the rules, they will choose between two people nominated by Conservative members of Parliament. This tiny group of people will decide who runs the nation. Will it be a so-called hard Brexiteer who will break all of the United Kingdom’s trade relationships overnight, or perhaps a “Remainer” who will seek a way back in to the European Union? Or perhaps a compromise between the two?

But although that seems like a big choice to give to a small number of people, the reality is rather more banal. In truth, whoever replaces May will face exactly the same choices and exactly the same dilemmas as she did. A British prime minister who decides to crash out of the E.U. with no treaty arrangements on a Monday will wake up on Tuesday to discover that his immediate priority is … to write a new treaty with the E.U. A British prime minister who wants to forge a reasonable compromise will discover that there is no majority for any compromise, reasonable or unreasonable, in the current House of Commons. A British prime minister who wants to remain in the E.U. will immediately face a wave of outrage from the one-third of Britons who have just voted for the brand-new “Brexit party.”

All of the constraints remain. All of the conundrums are unresolved. It is still the case that the U.K. cannot both exit the all-European customs union and keep open the border between Northern Ireland and the Irish republic. It is still the case that there is no Brexit “deal” that makes the U.K. richer, and certainly not 350 million pounds a week richer, as the Brexit referendum slogan in 2016 claimed.

It’s not a coincidence that none of the Tory leadership contenders can present a concrete plan, because there can’t be one. The only conceivable game-changers are another referendum, which “Remain” might win, thus alienating a part of the Conservative Party forever — or another general election, one that the Conservative Party, on current performance, will lose. There’s not much point in wishing good luck to May’s successor, in other words, because it’s unlikely to help.

Scroll to Top